The writ petition was accepted as a representation. The State undertook to consider the matter and pass an order within six weeks. The petition was dismissed on this express undertaking.
Petition dismissed in view of the State's undertaking to consider the matter expeditiously and pass an order within six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.6366 OF 2008
Smt. Lata Kautik Wagh @ Lata Prakash Bacchao .... Petitioner Vs
The Zilla Parishad, Nashik and others
... Respondents
Mr. Rahul D. Motkari for the petitioner.
Mr. V.P. Malvankar, Assistant Government Pleader for State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & A.P DESHPANDE, J. DATE : 11TH SEPTEMBER , 2008
P.C.:
The Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the
respondent-State submits that present writ petition would be treated as representation and consider the same in accordance with law and the policy of the State and pass appropriate order expeditiously and not later than six weeks from today.
this writ petition and the same is disposed of. Respondent shall abide by the statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
Lata Kautik Wagh
The Zilla Parishad, Nashik
SWATANter KUMAR
A.P DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
