In a writ petition, the Bombay High Court disposed of the matter on consent terms signed by the parties, marking them as evidence and clarifying the settlement binds only signatories.
Writ Petition disposed of based on consent terms signed by the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6022 OF 2008
M/s Eurrestra Industries Ltd. and another
).. Petitioners
Versus
A N Khaire and others
).. Respondents
Mr Y R Naik for the Petitioners. Mr K J Hakani for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C. J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED: 21ST AUGUST 2008 .
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for the parties have filed in
Court today the Consent Terms. These Consent Terms are duly signed by the parties and the learned Counsel appearing for them. For the purposes of identification, the same are marked “X”.
-2-
Court.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A. P. DESHPANDE, J.
M/s Eurrestra Industries Ltd. and another
A N Khaire and others
Swatanter Kumar
A.P. Deshpande
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
