The Court disposed of a writ petition regarding a matter pending before a Caste Scrutiny Committee. Directing the State to abide by the Respondent's statement, the Court ordered appropriate orders be passed within four weeks.
Direct the State to pass appropriate orders within four weeks and abide by the statement made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5938 OF 2008
Sagar Anand Gaikawad ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. R.K. Mendadkar for the Petitioner.
Mr.C.R.Sonawane, A.G.P. for State.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.&
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
DATED: 13TH AUGUST, 2008
P.C.
. The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent
makes a statement that the matter before the caste
Scrutiny Committee is pending and shall be dealt
with and appropriate orders will be passed by the
Scrutiny Committee expeditiously. In view of the
said statement, nothing survives in this petition.
We dispose of the Writ Petition and direct the State
to abide by the statement and pass appropriate
orders within four weeks from today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition survives in light of the pending nature of the matter before the Caste Scrutiny Committee.
Sagar Anand Gaikawad
State of Maharashtra
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court