Petitioners sought writ intervention regarding a pending application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court disposed of the petition upon the State's assurance of deciding the application within six months.
None; petition disposed of upon assurance of decision within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5484 OF 2008
Laxmi Gajanan Khutale & Ors. ...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
Mr. S.S.Punde, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. V.P.Malvankar, AGP, for the Respondent.
CORAM: BILAL NAZKI & J.H.BHATIA,JJ.
DATE: 3rd October, 2008.
P.C.
1. The grievance of the petitioners is that they have
moved an application under Section 28-A of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894 on 21.10.2003 and it is still not
decided.
2. The learned AGP for the Respondent assures that
the application will be decided within six months from
today. In view of this assurance, no further orders
are required to be passed in this Writ Petition. The
Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(BILAL NAZKI, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
Laxmi Gajanan Khutale & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra
BILAL NAZKI
J.H.BHATIA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court