Petitioner sought to withdraw Writ Petition No. 349 of 2008. The Court granted permission for withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 349 OF 2008
Klen and Marshalls Manu-
facturers and Exporters Ltd., .. Petitioner.
vs.
Union of India
& Ors. .. Respondents.
Mr. Naval Agarwal i/by M/s. Amarchand and Mangaldas
& S.A. Shroff & Co. for Respondent No.15.
Mr. Jay Joshi for Petitioner.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATE: 8TH AUGUST, 2008.
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the petitioner on
instructions of the petitioner submits that he does not
want to prosecute the petition and he may be permitted
to withdraw the same. The petition is permitted to be
withdrawn. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(K.K. Tated J.)
2
Klen and Marshalls Manufacturers and Exporters Ltd.
Union of India
J.N. PATEL
K.K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court