HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYIN THE…
Writ petition permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3286 OF 2008
Parmeshwar Bhagwan Ankushrao .. Petitioner.
vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Helen K. Mandlik for the petitioner
Mr.A.L.Patki, Sp.Counsel for respondent nos.1, 2 and 4
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
S.J. KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE: 8TH DECEMBER, 2008.
P.C.
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner on
instruction from the petitioner states that the
petitioner does not want to prosecute the petition and
seeks to withdraw the same.
2. Permitted to withdraw. Dismissed as withdrawn.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(S.J. Kathawalla, J.)
2
Parmeshwar Bhagwan Ankushrao
The State of Maharashtra
J.N. Patel
S.J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court