The High Court dismissed the writ petition relying on a previous Division Bench judgment, holding that the petitioners' contentions were already covered therein.
Rule discharged. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/ 1/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2909 OF 1989
Maharashtra Rajya Van Shramik Mahasangh & Ors.
...Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
...Respondents
Shri.K.S. Bapat for Petitioner No.1 & 2. Shri.Masurkar, A.G.P. with Shri.A.I.I. Patel for Respondent No.1 to 4. Shri.M.P. Badar for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : D.K. DESHMUKH & DATED : 26th FEBRUARY, 2008.
P.C.:-
/ 2/
petition fails and is dismissed. Rule is discharged. No order as to costs.
( D.K. DESHMUKH, J.)
(V.M. KANADE, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Maharashtra Rajya Shet Majur Union V/s. Tahsildar of Jawhar, District ThaneReferred¶1
Maharashtra Rajya Shet Majur Union V/s. Tahsildar of Jawhar, District Thane, Writ Petition No.2341 of 1985
Maharashtra Rajya Van Shramik Mahasangh & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
D.K. DESHMUKH
V.M. KANADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
