Single bench disposed of Writ Petition No. 1064 of 2008 holding it not a fit case for extraordinary jurisdiction as the petitioner could challenge the impugned order in appeal before this court.
Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1064 OF 2008
Vilas M. Pitale ... Petitioner
Versus
Union of India and Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Rahul Pardesi i/by M/s. K.R.P. Legal for
Petitioner.
Mrs. S.V. Bharucha with Mr. G.N. Shrinivasa i/by
H.P. Chaturvedi for Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 13, 2008
P.C.
. In our opinion, this will not be a fit case to
exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction as it will
be open to the Petitioners to challenge the order of
the tribunal before this court in Appeal. It will
also be open to them to raise all points which they
had raised in the Misc. Application before the
Tribunal which has been rejected in the appeal.
. With the above observations, Petition disposed
of.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
Vilas M. Pitale
Union of India and Ors.
F.I. Rebello
R.S. Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court