The High Court of Bombay at Bombay allowed the plaintiff's suit to be withdrawn on permission of the court granted following out-of-court settlement.
Suit allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of; Court fees refund directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
/ 1 /
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUMMARY SUIT NO. 1199 OF 2008
Ranjana Atul Sharma ...Plaintiff Vs. M/s. Enpal Aircon Technologies (I) P.Ltd. ...Defendant
Mr. S.R. Shukla for Plaintiff i/b Ramesh Jain for Plaintiff
CORAM: V.M. KANADE J. DATED 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Plaintiff submits
that the parties have settled the matter out of Court. He seeks permission to withdraw the suit. Suit is allowed to be withdrawn and is accordingly disposed
of. Refund of Court fees be paid in accordance with the Rules.
V.M. KANADE J.
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
