This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO. 19 OF 2007
Saloon, Beauty Parlour Association & Anr.
... Petitioners
versus
M.C.G.M. and another ... Respondents
Mr. J.S. Kini, instructed by Mr. Suresh Dubey, for the petitioners. Mrs. P.A. Purandare for the BMC. Mr. Rajiv Mane, Assistant Government Pleader, for the State.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
DATE: JANUARY 10, 2008 .
P.C.
Learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the Corporation would consider this petition as a representation, examine the matter and, if necessary, issue appropriate directions for implementation of the rules and regulations with regard to the affairs of the shops running in Mumbai. In view of the statement, nothing survives in this petition. The petition is disposed of with no order as to costs. The Respondents to abide by their statement.
CHIEF JUSTICE
J.P. DEVADHAR, J.
Saloon, Beauty Parlour Association
M.C.G.M.
Swatanter Kumar
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
