Single judge dismissed a Notice of Motion filed in a Writ Petition. The Court distinguished the matter from a cited previous judgment because the impugned complaint was dismissed in the present case, unlike the earlier one where the complaint was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.348 OF 2008
In
WRIT PETITION NO.1180 OF 2008
Shri Shantaram Ganpat Labde & Ors. : Petitioners
V/s.
Shree Ram Mills Ltd. & Ors. : Respondents
Mr.S.S.Pathak for the petitioners.
Mr.S.P.Singh for respondent no.1.
CORAM : S.A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2008.
P.C.
There is no reason to pass an order similar to the
one passed in Letters Patent Appeal no.325 of 1999 in Writ
Petition no.4513 of 1999 since the complaint in that case
had been allowed. The complaint here had been dismissed.
Hence, the Notice of Motion is dismissed.
S.A. BOBDE, J.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Letters Patent Appeal no.325 of 1999 in Writ Petition no.4513 of 1999Referred¶14
Shri Shantaram Ganpat Labde & Ors.
Shree Ram Mills Ltd.
S.A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court