The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai CITY-8, Mumbai v. Svc Superchem Ltd.
Bombay HCNMA/1210/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
(-1-)
¶2
MGN
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶4
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶5
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1210 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.528 OF 2005
¶6
The Commissioner of Income Tax...Appellant
¶7
Vs.
¶8
M/s.SVC Superchem Ltd.........Respondent
¶9
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant.
Mr. Atul G. Damle, for the Respondent
¶10
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 25TH MARCH, 2008
P.C.:
¶11
. There is a delay of 246 days. Considering
¶12
the cause shown delay condoned subject to the
Appellant paying to the Respondent costs quantified
at Rs.5,000/- within twelve weeks from today and
also removing the office objections, if any, within
twelve weeks. Subject to the above office to
register the Appeal.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Commissioner of Income Tax
- respondent
M/s.SVC Superchem Ltd
Coram
AI extract
F.I. Rebello
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court