This is a minimal order disposing of a praecipe. The High Court of Bombay directed a clerical substitution in a specific paragraph of a prior order, resulting in the disposal of the praecipe.
Direction to substitute the word 'Appellant' for 'Respondents' in paragraph 4 of the Order dated 12th September 2008; praecipe disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 133 OF 2008 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3007 OF 2007
M/s Priemier Ltd.
).. Appellant
Versus
Vasant Sadashiv Takale and others
).. Respondent
Mr Jahesh Desai i/b M/s Desai & Desai Associates for the Appellant.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & A.P. DESHPANDE, J. DATED : 20TH FEBRUARY 2009
P.C.
The matter has been placed on board on the praecipe taken out by the Appellant. Heard. It is directed that in paragraph 4 of the Order dated 12th September 2008, the word “Respondents” in the second line of paragraph 4 shall stand substituted by the word “Appellant”.
CHIEF JUSTICE
A.P. DESHPANDE, J.
M/s Priemier Ltd.
Vasant Sadashiv Takale and others
SWATANTER KUMAR
A.P. DESHPANDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
