This income tax appeal was dismissed because the framed questions were already addressed and resolved in a previous judgment of the same court decided on 23 January 2008, rendering the current appeal redundant.
The appeal was dismissed as the questions framed would not arise due to a prior judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATRE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JRISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.207 OF 2005
The CIT-II Mumbai ..Appellant
Versus
M/s.Lazor Syntex (P) Ltd., ..Respondents
----
Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the
appellant.
Mr.J.D.Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondents.
----
Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ
Date : 18.03.2008.
PC
1. The questions as framed in paragraph-5 of the
appeal memo are covered by the judgment of this
Court in CIT V/s. M/s.Saumya Finance & Leasing
Co.(P) Ltd., in Income Tax Appeal No.56 of 2005
decided on 23rd January, 2008.
2. In the light of the above, the questions as
framed would not arise and consequently, appeal
dismissed.
(R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CIT v/s. M/s. Saumya Finance & Leasing Co.(P) Ltd.Referred¶14
CIT v/s. M/s. Saumya Finance & Leasing Co.(P) Ltd., in Income Tax Appeal No.56 of 2005
The CIT-II Mumbai
M/s. Lazor Syntex (P) Ltd.
F.I. Rebello
R.S. Mohite
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court