The Court received a return showing compliance with an earlier order dated 5th September, 2007. Respondents filed an unconditional apology. Consequently, the show cause notice was discharged and the contempt petition was disposed of.
Show cause notice discharged; Contempt Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.2 OF 2008
IN WRIT PETITION NO.1619 OF 2007
Harendra Nath Pramanik ....... Petitioner.
V/s
Union of India & Ors. ....... Respondents.
Mr. Satendra Kumar for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajendra Raghuwanshi, ASG, Mr. R.V. Desai, Mr. S.M. Shah, Mr. Kiran Kanpile & Mr. S.C. Pal i/b Dr. T.C. Kaushik for the respondents.
CORAM: V.M. KANADE, J. DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2008
P.C.:
Authority. It is further stated that this order is passed without prejudice to the decision in the Review Petition No.20 of 2008. The apology tendered by respondent Nos. 3 to 4 is also accepted.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is maintainable in view of the compliance of the earlier order by the respondents.
Whether the respondents are barred from challenging the substantive order dated 5/9/2007 by virtue of this contempt finding.
Harendra Nath Pramanik
Union of India
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
