Judge Bilal Nazki dismissed a criminal contempt petition regarding centuries-old resolution boycotts, holding that decades had passed and it was not a fit case for contempt proceedings.
The contempt petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 15 OF 1995
Manubhai P. Vashi ..Petitioner
versus
Bombay City Civil & Sessions
Court Bar Association & Ors. ..Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. D. S. Mhaispurkar, APP for the Respondents -
State.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI &
A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ.
DATE : 10TH JULY, 2008.
P.C.
. This Contempt Petition relates to
resolutions dated 15.1.1987, 14.12.1993, 1.7.1995
and 15.7.1995 regarding boycott committed by the
Advocates. Since decades have passed when these
resolutions have been passed, we do not think it is
a fit case for initiation of the contempt
proceedings. Contempt Petition is dismissed.
( BILAL NAZKI, J. )
(A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)
Manubhai P. Vashi
Bombay City Civil & Sessions Court Bar Association
Bilal Nazki
A. A. Kumbhakhoni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court