Petitioner represented by Assistant Manager appeared without an Advocate and declined to file a reply. The court allowed chamber summons based on uncontroverted averments in the affidavit.
Chamber summons allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 255 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1920 OF 2008
National Textile Corporation
(S.M.) Ltd. ..Petitioner
versus
Kashinath Ganu Lingayat ..Respondent
Mr. B. P. Deshmukh, Assistant Manager,(Labour &
Welfare) of Petitioner present in person.
Mr. A. L. Gore for Respondent.
CORAM : S. A. BOBDE, J.
DATE : 17TH SEPTEMBER, 2008.
P.C.
. Heard.
2. The petitioner - NTC is represented by one
Mr. Deshmukh, Assistant Manager (Labour & Welfare),
who is present in court. He states that NTC does
not wish to file reply or engage an Advocate.
3. Having regard to the uncontroverted
averments in the Affidavit in Support, the Chamber
Summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
(S. A. BOBDE, J.)
National Textile Corporation (S.M.) Ltd.
Kashinath Ganu Lingayat
S. A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court