Disposed
Neeta Anil Sawant v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Developers Authority and Ors. and Anil Balkrishna Sawant and Ors.
Bombay HCCHSW/201/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.201 OF 2008
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 632 OF 1995
Neeta Anil Sawant. .. Petitioner.
vs.
Maharashtra Housing and Area
Development authority
& Ors. .. Respondents.
And
Anil Balkrishna Sawant & Ors. .. Applicants.
Mr. B.D. Belosey for Applicants.
CORAM: J.N. PATEL, &
K.K. TATED, JJ.
DATE: 4TH AUGUST, 2008.
P.C.
. Heard.
2. For the reasons stated in the affidavit in
support of the chamber summons, the chamber summons is
allowed. The chamber summons is made absolute in terms
of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendments to be
2
carried out within a period of two weeks. No order as
to costs.
(J.N. Patel, J.)
(K.K. Tated J.)
Neeta Anil Sawant
Maharashtra Housing and Area Development authority
Anil Balkrishna Sawant
J.N. PATEL
K.K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court