Allowed an interim order to read an amended order containing a clarification regarding an explanation given by the Personal Assistant. The applicant sought correction in the court record. The Petition was quashed.
Leave to amend granted to read the order dated 3rd July 2008 accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[ 1 ]
| IN THE HI CIVIL |
GH COURT OF APPELLA |
JUDICATURE AT TE JU |
BOMBAY RISDICTION |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIVIL | APPLICATION IN |
NO.1689 OF |
2008 | |
| WIRT | PETITION NO. |
4755 OF |
2008 | |
| Sau. Madhur | i Anant Joshi | ... | Applicant. | |
| Vs. | ||||
| Sau. Kunwar | Jagdish Maru | ... | Respondent. | |
| Mr. | D.S.Joshi | for | the | applicnt. |
| CORAM | : | A.A.SAYED, | J. | |
| DATE | : | July 24, |
2008. | |
| P.C. | ||||
| 1. | Heard. | |||
| 2. forthwith. |
Leave to | amend. Amendment to be ca | rried out | |
| 3. | Perused | the applicat |
ion. Per |
used the |
| explanation | given | by the PA Mr. |
S.R.Sakdeo. | It is |
| l | tht d |
t b fid |
itk th lt |
t |
| cear | a ue |
o ona e |
msae, e as |
senence |
| remained to the P.A. Th |
be typed in the order e said line reads thus |
which was dictated to |
[ 2 ]
the order dated 3rd July, 2008 be read accordingly.
the Court on 3rd July, 2008 she is cautioned to be more
careful and not to commit such mistake in future.
order duly authenticated by the PA/Sheristedar attached
to this Court.
[A.A.Sayed, J.]
Sau. Madhuri Anant Joshi
Sau. Kunwar Jagdish Maru
A.A. SAyed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
