A civil application for review was dismissed for default due to the absence of the applicant. None of the respondents were present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION (REVIEW) NO. 23 OF 2007
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 584 OF 2006
SHRI. DATTARAM RAMCHANDRA MARATHE ... Applicant Versus SHRI. MADHAV B. KELKAR & 2 ORS. ... Respondents
None present.
Coram:N. A. BRITTO, J. Date:28th February, 2008
P.C.
None present for the applicant. None present for the respondent No.1, who is duly served.
The application is dismissed for default.
N. A. BRITTO, J.
SMA
SHRI. DATTARAM RAMCHANDRA MARATHE
SHRI. MADHAV B. KELKAR
N. A. BRITTO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
