Allowed

The Diary Manager-Govt.Milk Scheme and Anr. v. Mohammed Daud Karbhari

Bombay HC1 Feb 2008CAL/352/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This document lists group civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against writ petitions. The High Court heard the applications ex-parte due to the non-appearance of respondents. The court allowed the applications, condoned the delay in filing the appeals, and listed them for admission hearing.

What did the court decide?

Delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeals was condoned; appeals numbered and listed for hearing.

The Diary Manager-Govt.Milk Scheme and Anr. Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶2

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.352 OF 2007
 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24152 OF 2007
IN

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.4145 OF 2006

¶5

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶6

 V/s.

¶7

 Shri Mohd. Daud Karbhari ..Respondent.

¶8

AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.354 OF 2007
 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24157 OF 2007
IN

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO.4146 OF 2006

¶10

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶11

 V/s.

¶12

 Narayan Mahadeo Panchagane ..Respondent.

¶13

AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.356 OF 2007
 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24161 OF 2007
IN

¶14

WRIT PETITION NO.4147 OF 2006

¶15

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶16

 V/s.

¶17

 Sandip Tukaram Surve ..Respondent.

¶18

AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.360 OF 2007
 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24169 OF 2007
IN

¶19

WRIT PETITION NO.4149 OF 2006

¶20

 - = : 2 : = -

¶21

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶22

 V/s.

¶23

 Vijay Bala Date ..Respondent.

¶24

AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.362 OF 2007
 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24172 OF 2007
IN

¶25

WRIT PETITION NO.4150 OF 2006

¶26

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶27

 V/s.

¶28

 Vasant Mahadeo Kadam ..Respondent.

¶29

AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.364 OF 2007
 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24175 OF 2007
IN

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO.4151 OF 2006

¶31

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶32

 V/s.

¶33

 Sitaram Narayan Salvi ..Respondent.

¶34

AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.366 OF 2007
 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24178 OF 2007
IN

¶35

WRIT PETITION NO.4152 OF 2006

¶36

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶37

 V/s.

¶38

 Vasant Sitaram Mane ..Respondent.

¶39

AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.368 OF 2007

¶40

 - = : 3 : = -

¶41

 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24262 OF 2007
IN

¶42

WRIT PETITION NO.4142 OF 2006

¶43

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶44

 V/s.

¶45

 Shashikant Shivram Salvi ..Respondent.

¶46

AND
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.370 OF 2007
 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST) NO.24139 OF 2007
IN

¶47

WRIT PETITION NO.4141 OF 2006

¶48

 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Applicants.

¶49

 V/s.

¶50

 Pandurang Sitaram Jadhav ..Respondent.

¶51

 Mr.A.P.Vanarse, G.P. for applicant.

¶52

 None for respondent.

¶53

CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J.AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, J.

¶54

DATED : 1ST FEBRUARY, 2008.

¶55

P.C. :-

¶56

 1. Counsel appearing for the appellant /

¶57

 applicant submits that besides serving personal notice,

¶58

 the respondents in the present appeals have also been
 served with the Court notice. Despite service, nobody
 is present on behalf of the respondent. Consequently,
 applications are heard ex-parte.

¶59

 - = : 4 : = -

¶60

 2. For the reasons stated in the applications

¶61

 which are supported by affidavits, to which there is no
 opposition, we are of the considered view that
 sufficient cause has been shown for condonation of
 delay in filing the present appeals. Consequently,
 applications are allowed. Delay in filing the appeals
 are condoned. Appeals be numbered.

¶62

 3. List the appeals for hearing at the

¶63

 admission stage on 13/2/2008.

¶64

 4. We make it clear that the appellant will not

¶65

 be entitled to any further time.

¶66

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶67

J.P.DEVADHAR, J.

The Diary Manager-Govt.Milk Scheme and Anr. v. Mohammed Daud Karbhari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Diary Manager-Govt.Milk Scheme and Anr. v. Mohammed Daud Karbhari

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Shamrao Devne Vs the District Dairy Development Officer, Kolhapur and Ors.

Laxmibai v. Sonawane Vs the State of Maharashtra

Harbhajansingh B Panfer Vs the State of Maharashtra

The State of Maharashtra Vs Arun Baburao Patil

The Dairy Manager - Govt.Milk Scheme and Anr. Vs Pandurang Sitaram Jadhav

The Dairy Manager - Govt.Milk Scheme and Anr. Vs Narayan Mahadeo Panchagane