This order allows a civil application by an applicant to condone a 28-day delay in filing a first appeal. The court found sufficient cause existed and listed the appeal for admission after registration.
The civil application for condonation of delay was allowed; the appeal was listed for admission after registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.121 OF 2008
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.157 OF 2008
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr.Jaiprakash L.Mishra, Applicant
in person.
Ms.Gajare, AGP for Respondent
Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 29th April, 2008
P.C.
. This is an application filed by
the Applicant to condone the delay
of 28 days in filing the present
Appeal. The Applicant is
appearing in person.
2. The averments as referred in
the Civil Application, show
sufficient cause is to condone the
delay. The Application is,
therefore, allowed in terms of
prayer clause (a).
( 2 )
3. The Civil Application is
allowed, accordingly.
4. Appeal be listed for admission
after registration.
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to sufficient cause should be allowed.
Dr. Jaiprakash L. Mishra
Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court