In a company application, the court observed that the BIFR reference is pending and final orders remain pending. Consequently, the hearing is adjourned sine die.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONCompany application No.430 of 2008
in
Company Petition No.48 of 2001
Lloyds Steel Industries: Applicant
v/s
Parasram Purohit: Respondents
Uma K. Shah for petitioner
Mr. Shailesh Naidu i/b G.H. Shrivastava for
applicant
Dy.O.L.S. Ramakanta present
CORAM: S.C.DHARMADHIKARI J. 5th June, 2008
Perused the affidavit in support of
the order annexed thereto and the orders, copies
of which are annexed thereto. There is obvious
error in as much as the BIFR has not passed the
final orders on the reference. The reference is
still pending before it.
In the light of this statement made
on affidavit hearing of the company petition is
adjourned sine die. Liberty to apply. Order
passed by this court on 8.1.2008 is modified
accordingly. C.A.disposed off.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lloyds Steel Industries
Parasram Purohit
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court