This single-paragraph order dismisses a second bail application filed through jail where there is no change in circumstances, noting the first application was rejected and the underlying appeal has been expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APLICATION NO.787 OF 2008 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.266 OF 2006
Shrikant Nagoba Kale ..Applicant. Vs. The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent.
Mrs. U.V. Kejriwal, APP for the State.
CORAM: SMT. RANJANA DESAI and, DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD 6th August, 2008.
P.C. :
This is second application for bail sent through jail. The
first application for bail has been rejected by a reasoned order. There is no change in circumstances. Hence this application is rejected. The appeal has already been expedited. Hence, that prayer also cannot be granted.
(SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.)
(DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)
Shrikant Nagoba Kale
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjana Desai
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
