This High Court rejected an application for bail filed by Krishnath Yashawant Pawar during criminal trial proceedings. The bench held that given the conviction and findings, the case was not a fit one for bail.
Application for bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.{1}.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.195 OF 2008
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.704 OF 2007
Krishnath Yashawant Pawar. ..Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. ..Respondent.
Mr.Abhaykumar Apte, Adv. appointed for the Applicant.
Mr.P.S.Hingorani, APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
DATED : APRIL 03, 2008.
P.C.:-
1. We have heard the learned Counsel for the
applicant, who is presently in jail.
2. During the course of the trial, bail was not
granted to the applicant. Considering the conviction
and the findings recorded, in our opinion, this is
not a fit case to grant bail to the applicant.
Application for bail is rejected.
(F.I.REBELLO,J.)
.{2}.
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this is a fit case to grant bail to the applicant who is already in jail with pending conviction.
Krishnath Yashawant Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
F.I. Rebello
Smt. V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court