The appellate court accepted an undertaking from the respondent not to create third-party rights in the suit property and dismissed the appeal with no order as to costs.
Undertaking accepted; appeal disposed of with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Appeal Against Order No. 85/2008
Leeladhar Gayneshwar Mendhekar ..vs.. Purushootam Vithalrao Chaple
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders
CORAM: A. B. CHAUDHARI, J. DATED : 12th November, 2008
Heard Mr. Paunikar, Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Ghare, Advocate for the respondent.
ADMIT.
Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel for the parties.
This appeal is being disposed of on the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent that the respondent shall not create any third party right or make any alienation, transfer or deal with the suit property in any manner whatsoever till the decision of the suit. Accepting this undertaking, this appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
kahale
Leeladhar Gayneshwar Mendhekar
Purushootam Vithalrao Chaple
A. B. CHAUDHARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
