Court permitted plaintiffs four weeks to file affidavit of service in multiple suits. Failure to comply will result in dismissal for non-prosecution. Matters relisted for February 29, 2008. Parties were absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.773 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.& Anr....Plaintiffs
Versus
Mohamed Rafique H.Saleh Mohamad ...Defendant
AND
SUIT NO.877 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.& Anr....Plaintiffs
Versus
Smt. Sushila C.Asrani ...Defendant
Ms.S.I.Shah M/s.S.I.Shah & Co. for Plaintiffs.
None for Defendant.
AND
SUIT NO.1129 OF 1994
The Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
M/s.Pareshkumar Ratilal & Co. ...Defendant
AND
SUIT NO.1306 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
: 2 :
Versus
Shri Rajkumar Sunderlal Karel ...Defendants
AND
SUIT NO.1541 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
Shri Jayant Nanalal Shah ...Defendant
AND
SUIT NO.1542 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
Shri Advani Pahlaji Motiram ...Defendant
AND
SUIT NO.1555 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
Meher Pharma India Ltd. ...Defendant
AND
SUIT NO.1620 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
: 3 :
Meher Pharma India Ltd. ...Defendant
Ms.Jyoti Thakkar for Plaintiffs.
None for Defendant.
AND
SUIT NO.1589 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
Shri R.K.Razaulha Attaulha ...Defendant
Parties and Advocates absent.
AND
SUIT NO.2213 OF 1994
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. ...Plaintiffs
Versus
Smt.Shamim Rashid Shaikh ...Defendant
Ms.Karishma Shirke i/b Gordhandas Fozdar & Co. for
Plaintiffs.
None for Defendant.
CORAM: A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
FEBRUARY 1, 2008.
: 4 :
P.C.
1. These Suits pertain to the year 1994. The
Plaintiffs in the respective Suits have still not
filed affidavit of service. When the matters are
called out today, Counsel for the Plaintiffs in
respective matters seek time to do the needful.
Plaintiffs are granted four weeks time.
2. It is made clear that if the affidavit of
service is not filed within four weeks from today,
the concerned Suit to stand dismissed for
non-prosecution without further reference to the
Court. If steps are taken in time, the matters be
listed on 29th February 2008.
A.M.KHANWILKAR, J.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd.& Anr.
Mohamed Rafique H.Saleh Mohamad
Smt. Sushila C.Asrani
M/s.Pareshkumar Ratilal & Co.
Shri Rajkumar Sunderlal Karel
Shri Jayant Nanalal Shah
A.M.KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court