The plaintiff's applications were allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed because the tax liability involved was less than Rs. 1,00,000.
The applications were allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.7 OF 2002 AND WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.8 OF 2002 AND WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2002 AND WEALTH TAX APPLICATION NO.24 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Wealth Tax
..Applicant
Vs.
Nagin M.Joshi
..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Applicant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 8TH JUNE, 2007
P.C.
. As the tax liability involved in the above
Applications is less than Rs.1,00,000/-, the learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the
above Applications. The Applications are allowed to
be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(V.C.DAGA,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Commissioner of Wealth Tax
Nagin M. Joshi
DR. S. Radhakrishnan
V. C. Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
