In a criminal writ petition, the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition after the state filed the charge-sheet, with liberty to pursue other proceedings.
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file other appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.959 OF 2007
Rajan Lilaram Gurnani .... Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra
& Ors. .... Respondents
Sarvasri Kamble i/b A.M. Saraogi for the
Petitioner.
Shri A.S. Gadkari, APP, for the State.
Shri Subhash Jha for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR &
Smt. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 17, 2007
P.C:
The learned APP states that the police have
already filed the charge-sheet. In view of the said
statement, the learned Advocate for the petitioner
craves leave to withdraw the petition in order to enable
the petitioner to file another appropriate proceedings.
With the said liberty, the petition is disposed of as
withdrawn. We make it clear that we have not expressed
any opinion on any of the points sought to be raised in
the petition and all the points are kept open.
(Smt.V.K.Tahilramani, J.) (R.M.S.Khandeparkar, J.)
sjs/S7cwp959.7
Rajan Lilaram Gurnani
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.S. Khandeparkar
V.K. Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court