The Single Judge dismissed the Criminal Writ Petitions, holding that the petitioners have an alternative remedy under Section 397 Cr.P.C. The petitions were disposed with liberty to file a revision before the Revision Court.
Petitions dismissed; liberty granted to file revision under Section 397 Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET APPELLATE SIDE
Criminal Writ Petition Nos. 897 & 900 to 910 of 2007
-----------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s orders of Coram, appearance, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -----------------------------------------------------------Mr.Bharat Joshi with Mr.Prashand Chande for petitioners. Mr.Abhay Nevagi with Mr.Yashpal Thakur i/b. Paras Kuhad & Asso. for resp.no.1. Mr.P.A.Pol, APP in WPs 897 & 900 to 902 of 2007. Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP in WPs 903 & 904 of 2007. Mr.D.P.Adsule, APP in W.Ps.905 & 906 of 2007. Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP in WPs 907 & 908 of 2007. Ms.S.V.Gajare, APP in WPs 909 & 910 of 2007. CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE,J. October 30, 2007. P.C. . The petitioners have alternative remedy of approaching the Sessions Court under Section 397 of Cr.P.C. stipulated by this Court in the case of V.K.Jain & ors. Vs. Pratap V.
2
| Padode | [2005 | (3) | Mh.L. | J. 778] |
and, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| therefore, | the | petitions | are | disposed | |
| with | liberty | to | approach | the | Revision |
| Court | under | Section | 397 of |
Cr.P.C. |
The |
| petitioners | are | at |
liberty | to rely |
upon |
| all | the doc |
uments | which |
have been |
filed |
in these petitions in support of their
case before the Revision Court.
(B.H.MARLAPALLE,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners have an alternative remedy by approaching the Sessions Court under Section 397 Cr.P.C.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
V.K. Jain & ors. Vs. Pratap V. PadodeExplained¶2
V.K. Jain & ors. Vs. Pratap V. Padode, 2005 (3) Mh.L.J. 778 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.H. Marlapalle
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
