The High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous after learning that the underlying municipality petition had already been decided. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7374 OF 2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of :
coram, appearances, Court’s Orders: Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar Orders:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mr.D.U. Siroya i/b Kiran Jain & Co.
for the Petitioner.
Mr.Rajesh Parab for the Respondent.
CORAM : D.G. KARNIK, J.
DATE : 24TH APRIL 2007
P.C. :
1. The learned counsel for the
Petitioner submits that the petition has
become infructuous in view of the fact
that the M.J. Petition has already been
decided. The petition is disposed of as
infructuous.
(D.G. KARNIK, J.)
Petitioner
Respondent
D.G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court