The petitioner informed the court that the matter is settled out of court and chose not to prosecute the writ petition. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution, along with the associated motion.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution; motion disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
| IN THE HIGH |
COURT OF JUDICATURE O.O.C.J. |
AT | BOMBAY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WRIT P |
ETITION NO. 701 |
OF | 2007 | |
| ALONGWITH | ||||
| NOTICE OF |
MOTION NO. 285 IN |
OF | 2007 | |
| WRIT P |
ETITION NO. 701 |
OF | 2007 | |
| ASHW | IN B. PATEL VS. |
... PETITI |
ONER. | |
| SLUM | D |
EVELOPMENT | AU | THORITY |
| AND O | RS. | ... RESPO |
NDENTS | . |
| MR. | Y.M.CHAUDHARY I/B |
. CHANDRASHEKHAR KHA |
MBEKA | R FOR |
| THE | PE | TITIONER. | ||
| MR. | K.R. BELOSAY AGP |
FOR THE RESPONDENT |
NOS.2 | TO 7, |
| 10, | 13,14, | 19,22. | ||
| MR. | G.M. UTANGA |
LE FOR RESPOND |
ENT | NO.1. |
| MR. | R.C.SHAH I/B.J.B. |
PATEL FOR RESPON |
DENTNO. | 15. |
| T.N.SU | BRAMANIAM SR. A |
DVOCATE I/B.M/S.MAKRAND |
GAN | DHI & |
| CO. | FOR RES |
PONDENT NOS.1 |
& | 2. |
| MR. | A.R.MISHRA | FOR RESPONDENT |
NO.16. | |
| CORAM | ..... : J.N.Patel and |
A.A.Saye | d, JJ. |
|
| DATE | : September ..... |
19, | 2007. |
2
P.C.
as the matter is settled out of Court. Petition is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.
itself, nothing survives in the motion, the same stands
disposed of accordingly.
[J.N.Patel, J.]
[A.A.Sayed, J.]
Ashwin B. Patel
Slum Development Authority
J.N.Patel
A.A.Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
