The High Court of Bombay disposed of the writ petition (No. 6877 of 2006) by holding that the petitioner's remedy lay in adopting independent proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
| IN THE |
HIGH COURT |
OF JUDICATURE AT |
BOMBAY | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPELLATE | SIDE | |||
| WRIT | PETITION | NO. 6877 OF |
2006 | |
| Leena Ma | hadev Patil. | ... Petitioner. | ||
| V/s. | ||||
| Smt. & Others. |
Laxmi | @ .... |
Bharati Mahadev ... Respondent. |
Patil |
| Mr. | Sameer | S. Ta |
mbekar for the |
Petitioner. |
| Mr. | P.D. |
Dalvi for |
Respondent Nos. 1 |
& 2. |
| Mr. | C.M | . Lokesh .... |
for Respondent |
No.3. |
| CO | RAM : S.J. VAZIFD |
AR, J. |
||
| 15TH JANUARY |
2007. | |||
| P.C. | : |
proceedings. The Petition is disposed of.
Leen Mahadev Patil
Laxmi @ Bharati Mahadev Patil & Others
S.J. Vazifd
A.R. Mer
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
