Milindkumar Ukardaji Hedaoo v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/6104/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
abs
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶3
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶4
WRIT PETITION NO. 6104 OF 2007
¶5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of :
coram, appearances, Court’s Orders: Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar Orders:
¶6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
¶7
Mr.R.K. Mendadkar for the petitioner.
¶8
Mr.C.R. Sonawane, A.G.P. for the
respondents.
¶9
CORAM : S.B. MHASE &
D.G. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 23RD OCTOBER 2007
P.C. :
1. Heard.
2. The order of the Caste Scrutiny
Committee, Amravati bearing No.DD/TCSC/
AMT/MUH/III-570/02 dated 16th April 2007
is challenged. This is a basic order
which is challenged and therefore the
petition has to be preferred before the
Nagpur Bench of this Court.
Accordingly, the writ petition is
disposed of with liberty to the
petitioners to approach the Nagpur Bench
of this Court, if the petitioner
desires.
¶10
(D.G. KARNIK, J.) (S.B. MHASE, J.)
Coram
AI extract
S.B. MHASE
D.G. KARNIK
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court