A writ petition was dismissed by a Bencher's Bench as not a fit case for interference due to disputed questions of fact. The order noted that remedies remain available to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
GPN-J.332-ARCHB-8.94-1310500-ALA4 Spl-H.C.A.S.C.D.79e
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO. 3776 OF 2007
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders
-------------------------------------------------------Mrs. Poonam Bhosale for Petitioner. Mr. V.P. Malwankar, A.G.P. for R.Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & R.M. SAVANT,JJ. DATED : JUNE 14, 2007
P.C.
. There are disputed question of facts. In our opinion, this will not be a fit case for this court to interfere in exercise of our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Petition disposed of. It will be open to the Petitioner to pursue whatever legal
remedies they may have including a civil
suit.
(R.M.SAVANT,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction to interfere in a dispute involving disputed questions of fact.
Petitioner
R.Nos. 1 and 2
F.I. REBELLO
R.M. SAVANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
