The Court held that the case was not fit for judicial intervention regarding the termination of an arbitrator's authority due to transfer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
WRIT PETITION NO.2407 of 207
Manohar Baviskar
..Petitioner
Versus
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. & Ors..Respondents
Mr. S.V. Jayakar with Ms. Gunjan S. Jayakar for the petitioner.
Ms. S.I.Shah for respondent NO.1. Mr. Niranjan Shimpi i/b. S.R. Nargwekar for respondent NO.3.
Mr. Kiran Khandpile for respondent NO.6.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO &
R.M.SAVANT, JJ. DATED : 12TH APRIL, 2007 .
P.C.
In our opinion this would not be a fit case for this
| Court | to | exercise | its | extra | ordinary | jurisdict | ion. | The | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| issue | would | be | whether | the | authority | of | the | Arbitrator | is |
| terminated | by | his | transfer | from | respo | ndent | NO.1 | to | |
| Respondent | NO.4. | That | issue | can only |
be | decided | by |
the | |
| Authorities | u | nder | the A |
rbitration | & |
Con | ciliation | Act, | 1996. |
In the light of that no interference called for. Petition
disposed of.
( F.I.REBELLO , J)
( R.M. SAVANT,J)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manohar Baviskar
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. & Ors.
F.I. Rebello
R.M. Savant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
