Disposed

Parvatibai Kesardev Morarka and 6 Ors. v. National Textile Corporaion (South Maharashtra ) Limited and 4 Ors.

Bombay HC3 Oct 2007WP/1973/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposed of four pending writ petitions and one appeal. The parties agreed to refer the dispute to arbitration within four weeks via Minutes of the Order recorded during the hearing.

What did the court decide?

All writ petitions and the pending appeal are disposed of as per the Minutes of the Order referring the dispute to arbitration.

Parvatibai Kesardev Morarka and 6 Ors. Vs… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2007)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1973 OF 2007

¶4

 WITH

¶5

 WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2007

¶6

 WITH
 WRIT PETITION NO. 1731 OF 2007
 AND

¶7

 WRIT PETITION NO. 435 OF 2007

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 1973 OF 2007

¶9

 Mrs. Parvatibai Kesardev

¶10

 Morarka & Ors. .. Petitioners.
 vs.

¶11

 National Textile Corporation
 (South Maharashtra) Ltd.,

¶12

 & Ors. .. Respondents.

¶13

WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2007

¶14

 Mrs. Parvatibai Kesardev

¶15

 Morarka .. Petitioner.

¶16

vs.

¶17

 Union of India

¶18

 & Ors. .. Respondents.

¶19

 2
WRIT PETITION NO. 435 OF 2007

¶20

 Rajputana Textile (Agencies

¶21

 Pvt. Ltd., & Ors. .. Petitioners.

¶22

 vs.
 National Textile Corporation
 Ltd., & Ors. .. Respondents.

¶23

WRIT PETITION NO. 1731 OF 2007

¶24

 Mrs. Parvatibai U. Morarka

¶25

 & Ors. .. Petitioners.
 vs.

¶26

 National Textile Corporation

¶27

 Ltd., & Anr. .. Respondents.

¶28

 Mr. Milind Sathye, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Deepan Desai

¶29

 i/by Kanga & Co. for petitioners in WP No.
 1973/07, 1731/07 & 435/07.
 Mr. G.S. Rao, i/by Lex Consultus for petitioners

¶30

 in WP No. 430/07 & for respondents nos. 4 &
 5 in WP No. 1973/07.

¶31

 Mr. Latif Pirani i/by Pirani & Co. for R. No. 3
 in WP No. 1973/07.
 Mr. D.H. Shah for National Textile Corporation.

¶32

 Mr. Shailendra Jha Manager (Legal) & P.T. Deshmukh,

¶33

 Asstt. Manager (Legal) of N.T.C. present.

¶34

¶35

CORAM: J.N. PATEL &

¶36

 A.A. SAYED, JJ.

¶37

 DATE: 3RD OCTOBER, 2007.

¶38

 P.C.

¶39

 . The parties have tendered the Minutes of the
 Order and submit that this Court may dispose of all the

¶40

 writ petitions in terms of the Minutes of the Order.

¶41

 2. The learned counsel for the parties after

¶42

 seeking instructions make a statement that the dispute
 shall be referred to the arbitration within a period of
 four weeks as agreed upon by them in clause (2) of the
 Minutes of the Order. The Minutes of the Order are
 taken on record and marked "X" for identification

¶43

 purposes. All the writ petitions stand disposed of
 accordingly including Appeal No. 62 of 2006 pending
 before the Principal Judge, City Civil Court at Bombay.

¶44

 (J.N. Patel, J. )

¶45

 (A.A. Sayed, J. )

Parvatibai Kesardev Morarka and 6 Ors. v. National Textile Corporaion (South Maharashtra ) Limited and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parvatibai Kesardev Morarka and 6 Ors. v. National Textile Corporaion (South Maharashtra ) Limited and 4 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Naresh Gangaram Chinchane Vs Bank Karmachari Sangh and Another

Kawaljeet Kaur Milkha Bedi Vs Milkha Singh Bedi

Gautam Pandurang Nage Vs Lata Gautam Nage

Sumer Corporation Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Mallikarjun Gurshidappa Inde and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

New D.N. Nagar Chs Union Ltd. Vs Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors. and Pinnky Gupta and Anr.