The court disposed of the writ petition based on reasons in recent judgments, extending the given period for four weeks.
Writ Petition disposed in terms of reasons stated in earlier judgments; period extended for four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O. O. C. J. WRIT PETITION NO.1647 OF 2007
Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi Vs.
The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist. and others
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr. Susheel Mahadeshwar i/b Ms. R. J. Todankar for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.D. Shetty for Respondent No.3.
CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J. 16th October, 2007.
P.C. :
As per the report of the registry, the Respondents have
been served. Except Respondent No.3, no other Respondents are represented.
The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the present Petition is covered by recent judgments of this Court in Writ Petition NO.563 of 2007 dated 21st June, 2007 and Writ Petition (Lodging) No. 1323 of 2007 dated 19th July, 2007. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the reasons stated therein. However, the period stated
2
in the order shall stand extended for a period of four weeks from
today.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
Maharashtra Suraksha Rakshak Aghadi
The Security Guards Board for Greater Bombay and Thane Dist.
SWATANTER KUMAR
DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
