Petitioners sought to withdraw a writ petition under Section 127 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, intending to file an appeal. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1608 OF 2006
M/s.Swasti Vinayaka Synthetics Ltd.. Petitioners
Vs.
Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika & Ors.. Respondents
Mr.D.S.Sakhalkar for the petitioners
Mr.Pradeep Jadhav, A.G.P. for the respondent no.4
Mr.H.Toor a/w Mr.J.S.Saluja i/b M/s.M.V.Kini for
the respondent no.2
CORAM : J.N.PATEL &
S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J
DATED : 5TH FEBRUARY, 2007
P.C.:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners
submits that he will prefer an appeal as provided
under section 127 of the Indian Electricity Act,
2003 and therefore, may be permitted to withdraw
the petition with liberty.
2. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
( SHRI J.N. PATEL, J )
2
( SHRI S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J )
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Swasti Vinayaka Synthetics Ltd.
Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika
J.N. PATEL
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court