Single judge disposed of a writ petition where parties settled the dispute amicably via consent terms and undertook to abide by them.
Petition disposed of on acceptance of consent terms and undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO.1549 OF 2007
------------------------------------:----------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
Mr S.K.Talsania i/b M/s Sanjay Udeshi
& Co, for the petitioner.
Mr A.D.Setty with Ms R. Joshi for
respondent no.2.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J.
DATED: 16.10.2007
P.C.:
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The concerned workman is present in court.
Learned counsel for the parties state
that the parties have amicably settled the
dispute and they have tendered Consent Terms
duly signed by the parties and their
respective advocates on record. The Consent
Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for
identification. Statements made and the
undertaking given in the Consent Terms are
accepted. The writ petition stands disposed
of in terms of the Consent Terms.
(D.B.BHOSALE,J.)
Petitioner
Respondent no.2
D.B. BHO SALE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court