Petitioner relied on a prior Division Bench order (Sumesh Kakade) to seek disposal on identical terms. The court approved this reliance and disposed of the writ petition accordingly, leaving parties to bear own costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MSS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 993 OF 2007
SANAT S. NARAYAN & ORS. .. PETITIONERS
Vs.
SHIKSHAN SHULKA SAMITI & ORS. .. RESPONDENTS
Mr. L. M. Acharya for petitioner
None for respondent
CORAM:SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
DATE:JULY 02, 2007.
P.C.
. The learned counsel for the petitioner relies
upon a Division Bench order passed by this court in
the case of Sumesh Kakade & Ors. v. Shikshan
Shulka Samiti & Ors., Original Side Writ Petition
(Lodging) No. 751 of 2007 decided on April 16,
2007 and submits that this writ petition can be
disposed of on the same terms.
. The order of that petition shall form part of
this petition. The writ petition is disposed of in
the above terms, leaving the parties to bear their
own costs.
CHIEF JUSTICE
2
SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sumesh Kakade & Ors. v. Shikshan Shulka Samiti & Ors.Followed¶14
Sumesh Kakade & Ors. v. Shikshan Shulka Samiti & Ors., Original Side Writ Petition (Lodging) No. 751 of 2007
Sanat S. Narayan
Shikshan Shulka Samiti
Swatanter Kumar
Ranjana Desai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court