Dr. Kalyan Sopanrao v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as the petitioner was not present and the matter was not prosecuted before the court on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO. 1109 OF 2007
Dr. Kalyan Sopanrao Munde ...Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Mr. P.M. Mokashi, Assistant Government Pleader, for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE: JUNE 05, 2007 .
P.C.
Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner. Dismissed
for non-prosecution.
CHIEF JUSTICE
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.
Dr. Kalyan Sopanrao Munde
The State of Maharashtra
Swatanter Kumar
S.C. Dharmadhikari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court