The petitioners sought leave to withdraw the criminal writ petition. The court granted leave to withdraw and disposed of the petition as withdrawn, vacating any ad interim order.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn; ad interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1210 OF 2006
Mohan S.Agarwal and ors...Petitioners.
Vs.
The State of M.P. and ors...Respondents.
Mr.J.A.Jodhpuri for the Petitioners.
Mr.S.R.Shinde, APP. for the State.
CORAM: B.H.MARLAPALLE, J.
DATE : August 23, 2007
P.C.
1. The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave
to withdraw the petition as the same does not survive
any more. Hence, leave granted and the petition is
disposed of as withdrawn.
2. Ad interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.)
Mohan S. Agarwal and ors.
The State of M.P. and ors.
B.H. MARLAPALLE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court