Sunil Madhukar Savant v. Smt. Vimal Bahanrao Savant
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge admitted an appeal on specific legal questions concerning maintenance liability under Section 19 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. The court dispensed with R and P and adjourned for the filing of a paper book.
What the court decided
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
SECOND APPEAL NO.612 OF 2007
------------------------------------:----------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of : Court’s or Judge’s orders.
coram, appearances, Court’s orders :
or directions and Registrar’s :
orders. :
------------------------------------:-----------------------------------
Mr Vikas Shivarkar, for the appellants.
Mr Milind Deshmukh, for respondent nos
1 to 4.
CORAM: D.B.BHOSALE,J.
DATED: 03.10.2007.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the
parties.
Admit, on the following questions of
law:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether defendants are liable to pay maintenance to a widowed daughter-in-law residing with her own daughter under section 19 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956.
Whether the lower courts were right in directing defendants to pay maintenance.
Whether the appeal shall stand dismissed for nonprosecution if a private paper book is not filed within six months.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellants
- respondent
Respondent Nos 1 to 4
Coram
D.B. Bhosal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Shri Shyam Arjun Kasakar and Anr. Vs Shri Pradip Shyamrao Patil and Anr.
Jaysing Bhausaheb Darvan Vs Ashok @Subhash Dnyandeo Darvan and Ors.
Janardan Govind Dindorkar (Decd) by Heirs Nirmala Janardan Dindorkar and Ors. Vs Vaman Govind Dindorkar (Decd) by Heirs Raghuvir Waman Dindorkar and Ors.
Pundlik Padman Madhvi (Decd.)by Lrs.-Ymuna Pundlik Madhvi and Ors. Vs M/S.Raptakoe Brett and Company Ltd. and Anr.