Appeal against the order dismissing a petition quashing a decree for eviction. The single-judge High Court held there was no reason to interfere as the appellant was not a tenant and the decree favored the plaintiff-appellants.
The Second Appeal is dismissed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE SECOND APPEAL NO. 275 OF 2007
Bhalchandra Nagesh Jahagirdar v/s. Ramraji Kacheshwar Tulshibagwale and others Respondents
.. Appellant
Mr. S.S. Kulkarni for the appellant. Mr. S.B. Deshmukh for the respondents.
CORAM : A.M. KHANWILKAR, J. DATED : 18TH JULY, 2007
P.C.
Heard counsel for the parties.
(A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal Court can interfere with the factual findings of the lower appellate court regarding the tenant status in the absence of the original tenant in the eviction suit.
Bhalchandra Nagesh Jahagirdar
Ramraji Kacheshwar Tulshibagwale
A.M. KHANWILKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
