The applicant requested withdrawal of the criminal revision application due to inability to pay expenses and maintenance. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application accordingly.
The Criminal Revision Application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURTOF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.316 OF 2007
Noorahammad Alauddin Nadaf ..Applicant. V/s
Smt. Benazir @ Najirabi Noorahammad Nadaf ..Respondent
Mr. Yogesh Sankpal i/b Mr. T.N. Sonawane for the applicant.
None for the respondent.
CORAM : J.N.PATEL AND
A.A.SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C.
The learned Counsel for the applicant submits
| that | as | the | applicant | is not |
in a |
position | to pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| litigation | expe | nses and |
main | tenance | to the |
respondent, | |
| he | wants | to | withdraw | the | Criminal | Revision | Application. |
Permitted to withdraw. The Criminal Revision Application is dismissed as withdrawn.
[J.N.Patel, J.]
Noorahammad Alauddin Nadaf
Smt. Benazir @ Najirabi Noorahammad Nadaf
J.N.Patel
A.A.Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
