Nitin Shrikrishna Tendulkar and Ors. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive summary available; the petition was disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner, who withdrew prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
PIL Writ Petition No.72 of 2004
Nitin Shrikrishna Tendulkar & ors.
..Petitioners.
vs
The State of Maharashtra and ors
..Respondents
Mr. S.V. Gavand for petitioners Mr.P.M. Patil AGP for respondent Nos.1 & 3 Mr. P.M. Palshikar for respondent No 2. Mr C.G. Gavnekar with Ms. Deepa Sawant for respondent nos 5 & 6
CORAM: H.L GOKHALE,Acg C.J. , & V.M.KANADE, J. DATE: February 8, 2007.
P.C.:-
Mr Gavand appearing for the petitioners states that
after filing of this petition, steps have been taken by the State Government to prosecute three of the wrong doers. The petitioner, therefore does not want to prosecute this petition any further. Hence petition stands disposed of as not pressed.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
V.M.KANADE, J.
Nitin Shrikrishna Tendulkar & ors.
The State of Maharashtra and ors
H.L. Gokhale
V.M. Kanade
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court