This application sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal. The court held that sufficient cause was shown based on the affidavit and condoned the delay, disposing of the Notice of Motion.
Condonation of 15-day delay in filing appeal; Appeal listed for hearing on 25th April 2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
nma480-07
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Notice of Motion No. 626 OF 2007 IN Appeal (L) No. 111 of 2007 in Notice of Motion No. 2112 OF 2005 in Suit No. 2433 of 1997 .
Mr. Arnold J. von Geyer & Anr. . ... Appellants / applicants vs.
Mumtaz Iqbal Shaikh & ors . .... . Respondents
Mr. Denzy Dmello for applicants Mr. D.Mohta i/b. Divya Shah Associates for respondent nos. 1 & 2. CORAM: R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR AND D. G. KARNIK JJ.
DATE: April , 4, 2007
P.C.:
application for condonation of delay of 15 days in filing the appeal. Considering the facts disclosed in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion sufficient cause has been
2
nma480-07
shown for the delay in filing the appeal. The delay is condoned. Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Appeal bearing Lodging No. 111 of 2007 should be listed for hearing on admission on completion of the registration formalities on 25th April 2007. Notice of Motion stands disposed of.
(R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause is shown for the 15-day delay in filing the appeal warranting condonation of delay.
Arnold J. von Geyer & Anr.
Mumtaz Iqbal Shaikh & ors.
R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR
D. G. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
