The High Court of Bombay, in a notice of motion, granted condonation of delay for filing an Income Tax Appeal after finding sufficient cause and no negligence by the appellant.
Notice of motion made absolute to condone delay of 106 days in filing appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
NOTICE OF MOTION No.186/2004.
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) No. 38/2004.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-18, Mumbai.
..Appellant.
Vs.
M/s. Rediffusion Services
..Respondent.
Mr R. G. Bhat for the Appellant. B. D. Damodar i/b Kanga & Co. for the Respondents.
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND V.C. DAGA,JJ.
DATED:17th April, 2007.
P.C.:-
appellant and the learned counsel for the
respondents.
| Notice | of | Motion seeking |
condon | ation of |
106 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| days | delay. | Sufficient cau |
se is |
made o |
ut | for |
|
| condoning | delay | in filing |
the |
above | appeal. | ||
| There | is |
no case of |
inaction, | negligence | or | ||
| want | of | bona | fide on |
the | part of |
the |
appellant. Hence, the notice of motion is
made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
(DR.S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-18
M/s. Rediffusion Services
S. Radhakrishnan
V. C. Daga
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
