Allowed
The Commissioner of Income TAX-10, Mumbai v. M/S. Cheminova India Ltd.
Bombay HCNMA/1236/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HVN IN THE HIGH COURT OF
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
((-1-))
HVN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1236 OF 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 640 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income Tax ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Cheminova India Limited ... Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED: OCTOBER 15, 2007
P.C.
. There is delay of 262 days. Heard parties. The
respondent considering the facts on record not
opposes the condonation of delay. In the light of
that, motion allowed in terms of Prayer Clause (a).
Office to register the appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
The Commissioner of Income Tax
M/s. Cheminova India Limited
F.I. Rebello
J.P. Devadhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court